19 February 2015

true colours

it's funny what it takes to feel like you 'belong'.

just last night i had a conversation with some compatriots from a running group which i frequent about the Boston Marathon.  a number of them have run this much coveted race, and have the appropriate bling to show for it ... various colourways of the official jacket (representing different years of the event) being one of the most notable items.  having attained my Boston qualification time twice in 2014 (once in the spring, which was not sufficiently fast enough to actually land me on the registration list for 2015, and once in the fall which should do the trick since it lies within the scope of the 2016 race for which i will have moved up an age category) i am looking forward to making the pilgrimage to the eastern seaboard to run this iconic marathon next april - and so i innocently asked the question 'how much will it actually cost me to get the jacket?'

the answer was not what i'd expected.

instead of a straightforward response of a definite dollar figure, i instead heard how i should be prepared to walk into the race expo with $700-1000 to spend.  i eventually did get to find out that the jacket itself is about $100 USD (and i know now that there are usually two versions of the jacket each year - one 'souvenir' jacket and another functional running jacket by adidas).

it may be because i'm such a cheapskate that i balked at the idea of parting with a grand for memorabilia from the expo - or it may be that i just don't consider being demonstrative about my accomplishments in that way being so important to me.  don't get me wrong - i'll probably still end up with an official Boston Marathon jacket should i get to go, and it'll be worn with pride, but it's not going to define or validate my achievements as a runner.  i think that it's the same train of thought that has prevented me from donning a "26.2" sticker on my car.  various blogpost conversations have taken place about the merits of visibly touting the distances that runners have successfully covered, and i hold nothing against anyone who wants to demonstrably announce that they are a half-marathoner, marathoner, ultramarathoner, ironman or what have you.  

it's just not me.

i like to feel as if belong to a tribe.  who doesn't?  and from the earliest gatherings there have been ways in which we have marked ourselves as clans - whether by 
body mods
black/white hats
belt buckles
bumper stickers.
i'll just keep foremost in my mind that my sense of identity, belonging, value and purpose is defined from the inside out, and not the other way around.


11 February 2015

“when nothing is sure, everything is possible.”

a little while ago my attention was piqued by the premise of a book called Antifragile.  steve magness had alluded to this book in one of his blogposts that i'd read from late last year and immediately i was intrigued by the notion that organisms and entities can benefit by deliberately exposing themselves to uncertainty, risk, adversity and change.

in many ways this is a mantra by which i tend to live.

however, it's not something that i'd thought to put into practice with regard to my race training regimen.

don't get me wrong - there's variety in my schedule.  for one, i don't run on the treadmill, so stepping out the door each and every day (regardless of lighting, ambient air and/or windchill temperature, traction conditions, and accumulated amount of precipitation) provides me with multiple route options.  still i will admit that i have 6 or 7 'favourite' paths to cover depending on the targeted workout (e.g. tempo run, interval training, hills).  i suppose that everyone has some tried and true standbys that they go to when tackling a particular type of run, partly because we are by nature creatures of habit.

and yet, if we do consider the thesis that athletes who race in variable conditions (e.g. weather, course undulation, fatigue level, susceptibility to injury, nutritional demands/processing, adherence to race strategy) benefit more by training in non-linear/predictable environments then we'd do well to seek out curveballs in our workouts.

i know that that this may seem like an unsound training approach.  my former running coach would have cringed at the thought of mixing up workouts in this way - his view was that improvement was best measured in an apples-to-apples kind of situation, so all interval workouts should be conducted on a standard 400m multi-lane track.  without those kinds of standardized metrics his opinion would have been that i'd/we'd have no idea where my fitness and speed levels really resided.

and yet there's something to be said for each person knowing their own needs and design best.  i'm certainly not adverse to change (what nassim nicholas taleb would deem 'fragile'), and i'm not even someone who just built to withstand the rigours of change and adversity (taleb's definition of 'robust') - but i'd consider myself a person who seeks out new challenges, new experiences and new expressions - quite potentially an 'antifragile' personality.  as such, i'd be more inclined and perhaps adept at actively engaging diversification across workouts - even those covering the same distances and intensities.

believing that this type of tactic jives with me, what has that looked like?
  • tempo runs that are not on the flats, but that have taken me out into the countryside on routes that had previously been reserved for long and/or easy runs 
  • long and/or easy runs that do not follow a loop course but that rather meander down city streets, exploring neighbourhoods that i've never wandered through before
  • hill work that varies from 10s steep (12%) hill sprints to 6% grade 30s hill repeats
  • pre-dawn runs that are sometimes preceded by a snack, sometimes by nothing
  • some runs gauged by pace, some by heartrate, others simply by feel.
i realize that this is not earth-shattering to most of you, but for me it is reflective of my attempt to become more and more #antifragile.

how do you mix it up - if you choose to do so at all?